Carlos, Despite of problems with Binding which I have described in separate thread - Issue with sizing which you are seeing on my screenshot still exists. You are asking how it was looking until now here you have -> https://ibb.co/LtcqWH1
In different view it looks like that -> https://ibb.co/C26Qvr7 - Card is stretched for some reason to weird sizes. Thanks, Piotr czw., 19 mar 2020 o 13:54 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > I'm trying to find that, but currently in release mode navigation doesn't > work at all - I moved back to the oldest build [1] and have same issue. In > the other words in release mode I don't see any content at all. I'm going > to prepare separate example which shows that issue. > > [1] > http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/1051/ > > czw., 19 mar 2020 o 13:46 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > napisał(a): > >> Hi Piotr, >> can you share how it was looking until now? >> Other option is to find from where commit started to fail >> >> >> El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 12:07, Piotr Zarzycki (< >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: >> >> > Hi Carlos, >> > >> > Your latest changes to containers messed up our UI in app. [1] I will >> > adjust it, but I'm really not sure what is actually happen that we have >> so >> > much mess there. >> > >> > [1] https://ibb.co/CPkxx8S >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Piotr >> > >> > śr., 18 mar 2020 o 16:57 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> >> > napisał(a): >> > >> > > Hi Alex, >> > > >> > > I'll try your sugestion about the flex grow. I revised the flex box >> code >> > > and in fact columns right now does not use flex config >> > > thanks >> > > >> > > El mié., 18 mar. 2020 a las 16:45, Alex Harui >> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid >> > >) >> > > escribió: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On 3/18/20, 3:12 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hi Alex, >> > > > >> > > > I'm experimenting for this concrete case with a calc(% - px) >> > formula >> > > > that >> > > > could work. don't like it so much since it means is something >> very >> > > "JS" >> > > > coupled but it should maintain responsiveness. Crossing fingers >> :) >> > > > >> > > > IMO, there is something already "very JS" in the code. You are >> using >> > > > display="flex" instead of running a layout pass on each container >> and >> > > > child. Which is the right thing to do, IMO, but has implications. >> If >> > > your >> > > > calc idea doesn't work out, I wonder what would happen if you simply >> > > > translated percentWidth on the columns to flexGrow or whatever >> > attributes >> > > > give relative sizes to the children in a flexbox. >> > > > >> > > > -Alex >> > > > >> > > > El mié., 18 mar. 2020 a las 3:44, Alex Harui >> > > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid >> > > > >) >> > > > escribió: >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 3/17/20, 5:14 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Alex, >> > > > > >> > > > > I'll try to see how things are done in MXRoyale's ADG for >> > > > columns. >> > > > > Really >> > > > > the problem right now is in that concrete case. I'm sure >> > > there's >> > > > some >> > > > > way >> > > > > to do it but while I'm using flex box already as you >> suggest >> > > for >> > > > many >> > > > > things, in this case I need to do calculations, since all >> is >> > > > based on >> > > > > how >> > > > > users will configure the columns via mxml with a mix (or >> not) >> > > of >> > > > > pixels and >> > > > > percentages. >> > > > > >> > > > > And because you are using display="flex", not having the child >> > > > columns >> > > > > also be CSS compliant with the width is probably causing the >> > pain. >> > > > That's >> > > > > what I saw with MXRoyale. >> > > > > You may be able to calculate the numbers, but then the columns >> > will >> > > > not be >> > > > > responsive as the "flex" container changes size. You will >> have >> > to >> > > > detect >> > > > > that and recompute. >> > > > > >> > > > > If you instead using the weighting system that "flex" children >> > > use, I >> > > > > think you will have less pain and more responsive-ness. Users >> > > might >> > > > gladly >> > > > > give up on the old Flex percentWidth overloading in favor of >> the >> > > > weighting >> > > > > system to get that responsiveness. >> > > > > >> > > > > My 2 cents, >> > > > > -Alex >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Carlos Rovira >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc089fb86c6e9419f5a5d08d7cb24d510%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637201231364732539&sdata=sl2FCZYFAeC9gGjhlZIK1TMTkxQCtsUjJgmqIOS0xWo%3D&reserved=0 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Carlos Rovira >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki >> > >> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >> > >> >> >> -- >> Carlos Rovira >> http://about.me/carlosrovira >> > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
