Cool, I must say that actually we are not able to use animations in CSS. @keyframe is compiling with no errors, but compiler doesn't bake it in the final App.css. So until that bug is solved I'm working just with Animation js API Anyway, I think we need to solve that bug and give people options, although is clear that GSAP is better.
What do you think about use GSAP as part of Royale Effects? will be some license issue? or we could use it? El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 9:53, Harbs (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Most significantly, see how poorly css transitions actually perform. Web > Animations seem to do much better than css transitions. I don’t think > anything beats GSAP though. > > > On Jul 1, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Harbs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > When and if we work on improved Effects, there’s a GSAP performance page > which is really useful for comparing different methods of animations and > how well they perform: > > https://greensock.com/js/speed.html > > > >> On Jul 1, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I have in mind to do something about Effects in Jewel at some point. For > >> now we have the Effects library already pointed by Harbs. > >> For Jewel my plan is to continue with the philosophy of adding through > CSS > >> as other things done in Jewel. > >> > >> El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 8:26, Harbs (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > >> > >>> Take a look at the org.apache.royale.effects package in the “Effects” > >>> project. > >>> > >>> See manualtests/EffectsExample for some sample usage. > >>> > >>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 4:17 AM, Hugo Ferreira <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> How to apply a simple standard effect (ex: Fade, Zoom, etc ...) ? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Carlos Rovira > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
