The phrase "royale-extreas" went by on this thread or another one. What and where is that?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 11:55 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Piotr, > > I don't know right now the internals of GSAP or other solutions, but my > point is, no matter how good it's...is proprietary, so user can take it and > use it in its projects, but we should not go that route, since Royale is > Apache and OS. > > Then we can see performance. GSAP could be the most performant, but I > think there's enough standard web solutions right now that are very good > and we can use in the right way with a compatible license. > > El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 16:15, Piotr Zarzycki (< > [email protected]>) > escribió: > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > It depends how good with implementation we can be vs. GSAP - I have no > idea > > how that library is build - Maybe it's using the same API as you are > going > > to use? > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020, 3:58 PM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Harbs, > > > > > > Since GSAP is proprietary I prefer go another route, that could be not > as > > > performant as GSAP, but I think we can sacrifice a bit there ensuring > we > > > keep on ALv2. > > > I think what we really need in most effects is easy to get those days > > with > > > Animate API. I think it is more interesting to get Animate API working > on > > > HTMLElement (that you already planned to do on royale extras) to avoid > > > bracket access, and we can get many effects working that way with a > good > > > performance. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 11:36, Harbs (<[email protected]>) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > Yes. GSAP is a proprietary license. > > > > > > > > The cleanest way to add GSAP support would be with a library that’s > > > > external to Royale. We could even do that on royale-extras which is > not > > > > strictly an Apache entity. > > > > > > > > While GSAP support would be great for those who want to use it, I was > > > > actually suggesting to use the *lessons* from the GSAP page on > getting > > > > performance right. > > > > > > > > > On Jul 1, 2020, at 12:00 PM, Carlos Rovira < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Cool, > > > > > > > > > > I must say that actually we are not able to use animations in > > > > > CSS. @keyframe is compiling with no errors, but compiler doesn't > bake > > > it > > > > in > > > > > the final App.css. > > > > > So until that bug is solved I'm working just with Animation js API > > > > > Anyway, I think we need to solve that bug and give people options, > > > > although > > > > > is clear that GSAP is better. > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about use GSAP as part of Royale Effects? will be > > > some > > > > > license issue? or we could use it? > > > > > > > > > > El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 9:53, Harbs (<[email protected]>) > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > >> Most significantly, see how poorly css transitions actually > perform. > > > Web > > > > >> Animations seem to do much better than css transitions. I don’t > > think > > > > >> anything beats GSAP though. > > > > >> > > > > >>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Harbs <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> When and if we work on improved Effects, there’s a GSAP > performance > > > > page > > > > >> which is really useful for comparing different methods of > animations > > > and > > > > >> how well they perform: > > > > >>> https://greensock.com/js/speed.html > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Carlos Rovira < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I have in mind to do something about Effects in Jewel at some > > point. > > > > For > > > > >>>> now we have the Effects library already pointed by Harbs. > > > > >>>> For Jewel my plan is to continue with the philosophy of adding > > > through > > > > >> CSS > > > > >>>> as other things done in Jewel. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 8:26, Harbs (<[email protected] > >) > > > > >> escribió: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Take a look at the org.apache.royale.effects package in the > > > “Effects” > > > > >>>>> project. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> See manualtests/EffectsExample for some sample usage. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 4:17 AM, Hugo Ferreira < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> How to apply a simple standard effect (ex: Fade, Zoom, etc > ...) > > ? > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> -- > > > > >>>> Carlos Rovira > > > > >>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
