I agree with this. I personally think that the strongest reason to not call it “1.0” is gaps in documentation. I wish I was better on that front, and we’d be in big trouble without Andrew… ;)
Harbs > On Apr 19, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > There are already some Royale apps in production so I think we are ready for > 1.0 in terms of code. Whether to call it 1.0 is probably a marketing decision > at this stage. There will be announcements and (hopefully) feedback to take > care of. > > At least that’s how I think of it. > > > > From: Andrew Wetmore<mailto:cottag...@gmail.com> > Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 3:42 PM > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > Subject: Getting to 1.0 > > I know it is not in the nature of Apache projects to have timelines, since > each volunteer chooses to work on the task that attracts them. However...do > we know what we need to do to get from now (almost 0.9.8) to a 1.0 release? > What critical elements are lacking? > > For me, there are big gaps in documentation, and I will try to attend to > some of them. > > The release-build process still seems slow and painful, but I don't know > that that is a blocker to 1.0. > > Anything else? > > a > > -- > Andrew Wetmore >
