Or even 0.10.0, 0.11.0, etc. would be fine too. No part of the major.minor.revision version code is strictly constrained to 0-9 only.
-- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 9:16 AM Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds good to me. I assume there is no reason that we cannot have 0.9.10, > 0.9.11 if we need to before 1.0, but I don't know about the 'automatic' > setting to 1.0. > > I'd also suggest that it might be easier to wait until January, because a > number of us will be affected in the coming weeks with holidays etc. > > At some point I will volunteer for the release process, but I do need to be > focused on the compiler and framework for the next couple of > months, instead of learning new things. I'll do what I can to support > anyone working on the release, though. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:48 AM Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I think there is enough to start a new release. Are there any volunteers? > > If we release 0.9.9 the next version will automatically (I think be set) > to > > 1.0. > > > > Are we ready for that? > > > > Appreciate your thoughts. > > > > >
