Well I spent more time. Besides the XML issues which are pretty much resolved, 
I ran into:

1. I have a setter in a class which was removed by the goog dead code removal. 
I worked around it by turning the setter into a method. I’ll see if I can come 
up with a minimal test case on that.

2. I have a library which has a LOT of dynamic pieces. I spent a LONG time 
trying to assign types to places where I was getting runtime errors. I now got 
to the point where there’s no more runtime errors, but it’s still not working 
and I’m pretty sure it’s because I missed some typing.

Is there any way to keep public accessors on one library or specific classes? 
I’d like to compile my app with:

"-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true",
"-export-public-symbols=false",
"-prevent-rename-protected-symbols=false",
"-prevent-rename-public-symbols=false",
"-prevent-rename-internal-symbols=false"

but be able to exclude a list of classes from that.

> On Dec 1, 2021, at 7:47 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I’m pretty sure the issue is related to events not being properly handled. 
> Although blinding might be worth looking into.
> 
> I’ll look into it some more when I have more time.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>> On Dec 1, 2021, at 7:14 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev 
>> <mailto:joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>> wrote:
>> 
>>> It *almost* works. I found and fixed two cases of bracket access which
>> broke things. Now I’m getting no errors, but it’s still not quite working.
>> I’m guessing it’s something simple that I need to fix.
>> 
>> Have you tried a smaller set of prevent-rename options? That might help you
>> narrow things down, if things start working better. I'd try allowing public
>> variables, and maybe public accessors, to be renamed first, and see if that
>> works. Those types of symbols are most likely to be getting accessed
>> dynamically somehow. However, I don't really have much in the way of tips
>> to narrow it down from there. ConstantBinding would be one thing to look
>> out for, which I mentioned in my summary.
> 

Reply via email to