I don't think this has been discussed before. I don't believe that there is any technical issue preventing it. I suspect that getters/setters just never crossed my mind when I implemented abstract methods.
-- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:19 AM Gabe Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just noticed that getters and setters cannot be abstract. > > I don’t remember if this was discussed before. Is there an issue with > adding that functionality? > > Thanks, > Harbs
