Ohh That would be nice ! Although I didn’t get used to have these new features.
Piotr Zarzycki On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 17:48, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> wrote: > I don't think this has been discussed before. I don't believe that there is > any technical issue preventing it. I suspect that getters/setters just > never crossed my mind when I implemented abstract methods. > > -- > Josh Tynjala > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:19 AM Gabe Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I just noticed that getters and setters cannot be abstract. > > > > I don’t remember if this was discussed before. Is there an issue with > > adding that functionality? > > > > Thanks, > > Harbs >
