Perfect Josh, thanks.

When the paramArray is, for example, the second parameter, what would that look 
like?
For example:
override protected function fn_hello(index:int, ... args){
        // These are the tests I have done but none of them work for me
        super.fn_hello.apply(index,args); 
        super.fn_hello.apply(index,[this].concat(args)); // Add "this" and, for 
example, index 0 is not the first parameter of args but "this" (as expected)}
,,,

Hiedra

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> 
Enviado el: viernes, 29 de noviembre de 2024 18:14
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Parameters of type paramArray

I think that this should do what you want:

super.reevalAccesControl.apply(this, args);


--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>


On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 7:26 AM Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> wrote:

> Hi, I've always faced this problem, but I don't know how to give a 
> definitive solution.
> Parameters of type paramarray increase their nesting from one call to 
> another, for example:
>
> Public class ControllerFirst extends ControllerBase {
>                 ...
>                 private function fnmove():void{
>                                var foo:String = "hello";
>                                 reevalAccessControl(foo);
>                 }
>                 ...
> override protected function reevalAccessControl(... args):void{
>                 // In the first call, from fnmove "arguments" you have 
> an element [0] with a value "hello"
>                 super.reevalAccesControl(args);
>                 ...
> }
> }
>
> Public class ControllerBase
> {
> ...
> protected function reevalAccessControl(... args):void{
>                 // When this function is called from ControllerFirst 
> arguments has an element [0] but this element in turn is an array of 1 
> element and the value "hello" is found in args[0][0] on a second level
>                 ...
> }
> ...
> }
>
> I don't know if I have explained myself... I understand why it happens 
> but I wonder if there is a way to pass this type of arguments so that 
> the nesting level 0 is respected and a level is not added for each call.
>
> Thx.
> Hiedra
>
>

Reply via email to