I’m not clear on what you’re trying to do.
Given a variable of an array arr = [1,2,3]:
If you call the function directly (i.e. fn_fooBisarr)), the full array will be
the first argument of the function, so you’ll get fn_fooBis([1,2,3]);
If you call the function using. fn_fooBis.apply(thisArg,arr), that’s the same
as calling: fn_fooBis(1,2,3) (thisArg can be the this context you want or null
if you don’t care about the “this" context)
Harbs
> On Dec 1, 2024, at 4:56 PM, Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> wrote:
>
> When I have to pass the "args" to a function without super, it doesn't allow
> me to use .apply(this,args) in all cases and if I pass them directly the
> recursive increment occurs again... Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh
>
> I've looked at the SDK code and it's not clear to me how I can do it.
> For example:
> protected function fn_foo( ... args){
> // fn_fooBis.apply(this, args) // not working
> fn_fooBis(args);
> }
> Private function fn_fooBis(... args):void{
> trace( args); // two nestings.
> }
>
> Hiedra
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com>
> Enviado el: domingo, 1 de diciembre de 2024 15:12
> Para: dev@royale.apache.org
> Asunto: RE: Parameters of type paramArray
>
> Perfect Josh, thanks.
>
> When the paramArray is, for example, the second parameter, what would that
> look like?
> For example:
> override protected function fn_hello(index:int, ... args){
> // These are the tests I have done but none of them work for me
> super.fn_hello.apply(index,args);
> super.fn_hello.apply(index,[this].concat(args)); // Add "this" and, for
> example, index 0 is not the first parameter of args but "this" (as expected)}
> ,,,
>
> Hiedra
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> Enviado el: viernes, 29 de
> noviembre de 2024 18:14
> Para: dev@royale.apache.org
> Asunto: Re: Parameters of type paramArray
>
> I think that this should do what you want:
>
> super.reevalAccesControl.apply(this, args);
>
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 7:26 AM Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, I've always faced this problem, but I don't know how to give a
>> definitive solution.
>> Parameters of type paramarray increase their nesting from one call to
>> another, for example:
>>
>> Public class ControllerFirst extends ControllerBase {
>> ...
>> private function fnmove():void{
>> var foo:String = "hello";
>> reevalAccessControl(foo);
>> }
>> ...
>> override protected function reevalAccessControl(... args):void{
>> // In the first call, from fnmove "arguments" you have
>> an element [0] with a value "hello"
>> super.reevalAccesControl(args);
>> ...
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Public class ControllerBase
>> {
>> ...
>> protected function reevalAccessControl(... args):void{
>> // When this function is called from ControllerFirst
>> arguments has an element [0] but this element in turn is an array of 1
>> element and the value "hello" is found in args[0][0] on a second level
>> ...
>> }
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> I don't know if I have explained myself... I understand why it happens
>> but I wonder if there is a way to pass this type of arguments so that
>> the nesting level 0 is respected and a level is not added for each call.
>>
>> Thx.
>> Hiedra
>>
>>
