Hi Yi, This only publishes the artifacts to the staging repository for testing. After completing the vote, you can "release" the artifacts to the public repository by clicking the "release" button. :)
Thanks, Fang, Yan yanfang...@gmail.com On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Yan, > > Thanks for point out that! Actually I saw that last time and had the > following question: should we publish the artifacts after the VOTE is > completed or together w/ the VOTE? > It seems like that we want to publish the binary artifacts together w/ the > VOTE, right? > > -Yi > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Yi Pan, > > > > " Is there any document regarding to how to publish the maven staging > link? > > " > > > > -- Yes. Check the last part of the > > https://github.com/apache/samza/blob/master/RELEASE.md . Not sure if you > > have seen this. I should have pointed it out earlier. *_* > > > > Thanks, > > > > Fang, Yan > > yanfang...@gmail.com > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, guys, > > > > > > I am working on the list of things posted by Yan: > > > > > > 1. I have the difficulty in building the 0.9.1 branch. I think this is > > > mainly related to SAMZA-721 > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-721>. > > > > > > This seems to be an invalid case in 0.9.1. We only need the > > > joint-compilation option in master. > > > > > > 2. Also, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-712 seems > bothering > > > people as well. > > > > > > Committed to master and backported to 0.9.1. > > > > > > 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-720 is a critical bug > we > > > need to fix. Have already attached a patch. > > > > > > Plan to backport to 0.9.1. > > > > > > 4. There is no maven staging link. > > > > > > Is there any document regarding to how to publish the maven staging > link? > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Naveen Somasundaram < > > > nsomasunda...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Yan, > > > > SAMZA-721 might be because you checkout master and > > > switched > > > > to 0.9.1 branch, and you still have some files from master which git > is > > > not > > > > tracking. Can you try a git clean before you build 0.9.1 ? AFAIK you > > > don't > > > > need joint compilation for core in 0.9.1. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Roger Hoover < > roger.hoo...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yan, > > > > > > > > > > I tested to patch locally and it looks good. Creating a patched > > > release > > > > > for myself to test in our environment. Thanks, again. > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 22, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Yan, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the quick fix on the mentioned bugs. It seems > the > > > fix > > > > > for > > > > > > SAMZA-720 is pretty localized and I am OK to push it into 0.9.1. > I > > > will > > > > > be > > > > > > working on back porting those changes to 0.9.1 later today and > fix > > > all > > > > > the > > > > > > release related issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > -Yi > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Roger Hoover < > > > roger.hoo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Yan, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> You rock. Thank you so much for the quick fix. I'm working on > > > > building > > > > > >> and testing the patch. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Cheers, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Roger > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Yan Fang < > yanfang...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Hi guys, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> 1. I have the difficulty in building the 0.9.1 branch. I think > > this > > > > is > > > > > >>> mainly related to SAMZA-721 > > > > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-721>. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> 2. Also, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-712 seems > > > > > bothering > > > > > >>> people as well. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-720 is a > critical > > > bug > > > > > we > > > > > >>> need to fix. Have already attached a patch. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> 4. There is no maven staging link. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Thanks, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Fang, Yan > > > > > >>> yanfang...@gmail.com > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Roger Hoover < > > > > roger.hoo...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> Hi all, > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Do you think we could get this bootstrapping bug fixed before > > > 0.9.1 > > > > > >>>> release? It seems like a critical bug. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-720 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Roger > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Yan Fang < > > yanfang...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> Agree. I will test it this weekend. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Fang, Yan > > > > > >>>>> yanfang...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Guozhang Wang < > > > > wangg...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Since we only get one vote so far, I think I have to extend > > the > > > > > >> vote > > > > > >>>>>> deadline. Let's set it to next Monday 6pm. > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Please check the candidate and vote for your opinions. > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Guozhang > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Yi Pan < > nickpa...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> +1. Ran the Samza failure test suite and succeeded over > > night. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Guozhang Wang < > > > > > >> wangg...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hey all, > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza > > 0.9.1. > > > > > >>> This > > > > > >>>>> is a > > > > > >>>>>>>> bug-fix release against 0.9.0. > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> The release candidate can be downloaded from here: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~guozhang/samza-0.9.1-rc0/ > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> The release candidate is signed with pgp key 911402D8, > which > > > is > > > > > >>>>>>>> included in the repository's KEYS file: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=samza.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=6f5bafb6cd93934781161eb6b1868d11ea347c95 > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> and can also be found on keyservers: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x911402D8 > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> The git tag is release-0.9.1-rc0 and signed with the same > > pgp > > > > > >>> key: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=samza.git;a=tag;h=e78b9e7f34650538b4bb68b338eb472b98a5709e > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Test binaries have been published to Maven's staging > > > > > >> repository, > > > > > >>>> and > > > > > >>>>>> are > > > > > >>>>>>>> available here: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> 5 critical bugs were resolved for this release: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-715?jql=project%20%3D%20SAMZA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29 > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours ( end in 6:00pm > Saturday, > > > > > >>>>> 06/20/2015 > > > > > >>>>>>> ). > > > > > >>>>>>>> Please download the release candidate, check the > > > > > >>> hashes/signature, > > > > > >>>>>> build > > > > > >>>>>>> it > > > > > >>>>>>>> and test it, and then please vote: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve > > > > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> -- Guozhang > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> -- > > > > > >>>>>> -- Guozhang > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
