+1 (non binding) from me. - Prateek
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Boris S <bor...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 Looks good to me. > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:00 PM, xinyu liu <xinyuliu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 on my side. Very happy to see this proposal. This is a blocker for > > integrating fluent API with StreamProcessor, and hopefully we can get it > > resolved soon :). > > > > Thanks, > > Xinyu > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Navina Ramesh (Apache) < > > nav...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > This is a voting thread for SEP-1: Semantics of ProcessorId in Samza. > > > For reference, here is the wiki link: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SAMZA/SEP- > > > 1%3A+Semantics+of+ProcessorId+in+Samza > > > > > > Link to discussion mail thread: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/samza-dev/201703. > > > mbox/%3CCANazzuuHiO%3DvZQyFbTiYU-0Sfh3riK%3Dz4j_ > > AdCicQ8rBO%3DXuYQ%40mail. > > > gmail.com%3E > > > > > > Please vote on this SEP asap. :) > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Navina > > > > > >
