I agree. For this kind of discussion, I think a vote would be more appropriate.
Warm regards, Ji Min Jianbin Chen <[email protected]> 于2024年1月22日周一 21:30写道： > Hi, members of the Apache Seata community, > > I have submitted a proposal in the Apache JIRA with the aim of ensuring > more thorough reviews of the incubator-seata-website repository to prevent > any errors or omissions. Last week, many PRs were merged without going > through the CI workflow, indicating that our code reviews were not > meticulous enough and should be complemented by relevant CI workflows to > reduce the occurrence of review mistakes. > > Once GitHub Actions workflows are enabled, we can obtain results within a > few minutes after the PR is submitted. During this time, community > maintainers can also perform code reviews. If the review is done minutes > later, any exceptions highlighted by the CI workflow can be better > identified, reducing a significant amount of manual effort. Therefore, I > propose that GitHub Actions workflows be automatically enabled for > non-first-time contributors submitting PRs. As mentioned above, this > approach is highly suitable for enhancing the security of the Seata > official website and reducing the human resource costs associated with code > reviews. Furthermore, it will not impact the efficiency of PR merging; > instead, it will improve it. > > JIRA link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25412 > > Jianbin Chen >
