After previous discussions and designs, I implemented a version of the
X2Seatunnel tool.

https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/9507
https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/9664

We need to first discuss the necessity of adding a new repo. Is it
better to integrate it into the Seatunnel project or create a separate
project?

1. If a new repo is added, it will be inconvenient for me to reuse the
current code management solution. Also, there may be a lot of work in
building a new project, and I don't have much experience in this
regard.
2. Previously, using Java to implement it was considered to reuse the
technical stack of the current Seatunnel project. If it is a new
project, can Python be considered? Both have their advantages and
disadvantages, but Python has fewer overall lines of code and better
support for engines like Jinja2.
3. If it is a separate project, the functionality of X2Seatunnel seems
a bit thin, and I'm worried that the project value may not be
sufficient.

Of course, the advantages of a separate project are obvious. It can be
iterated faster and is easier to control.

Reply via email to