Hi Jerrod,

Can you try to use this method:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/master/sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/sedona/sql/adapterTestScala.scala#L138

Basically, you need to use rdd.fieldnames as input parameters. I think our
doc missed this part.

Our Adapter implementation for join query result is here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/master/sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/sedona/sql/utils/Adapter.scala#L130

Thanks,
Jia

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:13 AM Jerrod Wagnon <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I’m sure this is something simple I’m missing.  Caveat, I’m not a
> developer, but can manage.
>
>
>
> Is there something different that needs to be done in Sedona vs the
> previous Snapshot version for Spark 3.0 to get additional columns to carry
> through in the JoinQuery.SpatialJoinQueryFlat results?  Previously, I just
> passed the columns in with the Adapter.toSpatialRDD and they carried
> through.  Now, I'm just just getting my two Geometry columns when
> converting back to a dataframe.  I've tried passing the left and right
> field names into Adapter.toDf, but that results in an error when displaying
> the resulting dataframe.  I’m using Scala in Databricks.  I’ve read the
> online documentation, but can’t seem to find examples that help in this
> scenario.
>
>
>
> *Sedona:*
>
>
>
>
>
> *Snapshot:*
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Jerrod*
> This email contains confidential material for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized
> to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and
> delete all copies of this message.
>

Reply via email to