> On April 6, 2017, 7:04 p.m., Hao Hao wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/SentryService.java
> > Lines 310 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58221/diff/1/?file=1685541#file1685541line325>
> >
> >     Why not directly shutdown and make it null?

I checked the behavior of shutdown(): "Initiates an orderly shutdown in which 
previously submitted tasks are executed, but no new tasks will be accepted. 
Invocation has no additional effect if already shut down." It may take some 
time before shutdown() returns and could throw "SecurityException". 

It is safer to set the hmsFollowerExecutor null before calling the shutdown(). 
If someone calls startHMSFollower() during this time, it would work properly, 
i.e., it can be started and HmsFollower work can be scheduled.


> On April 6, 2017, 7:04 p.m., Hao Hao wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/SentryService.java
> > Lines 313 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58221/diff/1/?file=1685541#file1685541line328>
> >
> >     Extra line?

Will remove the extra line


- Na


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58221/#review171238
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 5, 2017, 10:29 p.m., Na Li wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58221/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 5, 2017, 10:29 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Alexander Kolbasov, Hao Hao, kalyan kumar 
> kalvagadda, and Sergio Pena.
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> SENTRY-1649 move HMS follower to runServer
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/SentryService.java
>  132db635f639cef91ce675d34d717e6125a0a4d1 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58221/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Na Li
> 
>

Reply via email to