> On April 6, 2017, 7:04 p.m., Hao Hao wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/SentryService.java
> > Lines 310 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58221/diff/1/?file=1685541#file1685541line325>
> >
> >     Why not directly shutdown and make it null?
> 
> Na Li wrote:
>     I checked the behavior of shutdown(): "Initiates an orderly shutdown in 
> which previously submitted tasks are executed, but no new tasks will be 
> accepted. Invocation has no additional effect if already shut down." It may 
> take some time before shutdown() returns and could throw "SecurityException". 
>     
>     It is safer to set the hmsFollowerExecutor null before calling the 
> shutdown(). If someone calls startHMSFollower() during this time, it would 
> work properly, i.e., it can be started and HmsFollower work can be scheduled.
> 
> Na Li wrote:
>     I changed it. Now, the HMSFollower is directly shut down and set to null

I have updated the code to reuse the HMSFollower instance


- Na


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58221/#review171238
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 12, 2017, 3:47 a.m., Na Li wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58221/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 12, 2017, 3:47 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Alexander Kolbasov, Hao Hao, kalyan kumar 
> kalvagadda, and Sergio Pena.
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> SENTRY-1649 move HMS follower to runServer
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/HMSFollower.java
>  6c14f5e 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/SentryService.java
>  132db63 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58221/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Na Li
> 
>

Reply via email to