> On Feb. 21, 2018, 5:13 p.m., Sergio Pena wrote:
> > sentry-binding/sentry-binding-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/binding/metastore/SentrySyncHMSNotificationsPostEventListener.java
> > Lines 137-140 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65704/diff/2/?file=1962959#file1962959line137>
> >
> > What if oldDbName and newDbname are nulls but oldTablename and
> > newTableName are not null and different? Should we consider it as a table
> > rename?
> >
> > Would the following conditions be simpler?
> >
> > if (oldTableName != null && newTableName != null) {
> > if (oldTableName.equalsIgnoreCase(newTableName) {
> > return true;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > if (oldDbName != null && newDbname != null) {
> > if (oldDbName.equalsIgnoreCase(newDbname) {
> > return true;
> > }
> > }
>
> Na Li wrote:
> I am following the logic in Notification.processAlterTable. We need to
> keep the same logic in this function and Notification.processAlterTable
>
> Sergio Pena wrote:
> If we need to keep the same logic, would make sense to have a shared
> method that checks if a table is renamed? Also, the Notification method
> checks for path changes as well (not just rename), so does it mean we sync
> with these changes as well? Notice that locations are useful for HDFS sync
> only not grant/revoke privileges.
>
> Na Li wrote:
> I cannot. The input here is of type AlterTableEvent. The input in
> Notification.processAlterTable is NotificationEvent. It is too much trouble
> to use the same function for such simple logic
seems to me, even for other alter table cases, it is impossible for one the
these {old db name, new db name, old table name, new table name} to be null.
what does it mean when one of them is null?
- Na
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65704/#review197936
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 22, 2018, 1:28 a.m., Na Li wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65704/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Feb. 22, 2018, 1:28 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for sentry, Alexander Kolbasov, kalyan kumar kalvagadda, and
> Sergio Pena.
>
>
> Repository: sentry
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> wait for HMS sync at alter table, which including table rename and changing
> table columns
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>
> sentry-binding/sentry-binding-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/binding/metastore/SentrySyncHMSNotificationsPostEventListener.java
> 24d7763
>
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
> edea5b6
>
> sentry-tests/sentry-tests-hive/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/tests/e2e/dbprovider/TestDbPrivilegeCleanupOnDrop.java
> 5fe6625
>
> sentry-tests/sentry-tests-hive/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/tests/e2e/hdfs/TestHDFSIntegrationBase.java
> 4cd00e6
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65704/diff/3/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> unit tests succeeded
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Na Li
>
>