Hello Freeman,
You may be right, but at the moment I first have to come up  at the more 
technical way and have to exercise some realization patterns in the servicemix 
environment. So at the moment I study the source to see what options I have to  
do the things in the right way.
Cheers
Joerg

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Freeman Fang [mailto:[email protected]] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2009 10:31
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: AW: SMX3.3 Writing a BC

Hi,
Then I think the better way is add features based on the currrent snmp 
bc, and if you want you can provide patch so that other guys can benefit 
from your work. :-)
Regards
Freeman

Hubschneider Joerg (CI/TMP) wrote:
> Hello Freemann
> Thanks for your response. OK, I want to provide a fully featured SNMP 
> protocoll BC. I have taken a look to the existent snmp-bc from Lars 
> Heinemann, which is a OID polling component. If I want to support SNMP  GET 
> (GET_WALK GET_BULK..) and SET actions and in addition receiving SNMP traps, I 
> have to set up the appropriated SNMP schemas and WSDLs for full featured SNMP 
> over WebServices inside a ESB.
> OK, I hope my intention is more clear.
> Kind regards
> Joerg
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Freeman Fang [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2009 10:01
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: SMX3.3 Writing a BC
>
> Hubschneider Joerg (CI/TMP) wrote:
>   
>> Hello servicemix guys,
>>
>> I want to write a Binding Component with a cxf-se-wsdl-first SU
>> provider. 
>> Is there a nice example which helps a newbie for a rapid startup?
>>
>>   
>>     
> I'm not sure I understand what you want here.
> May I ask why you need write a Binding Component yourself, we already 
> have cxf binding component which also support asynchronous communication.
> Freeman
>   
>> In the second step, I want to provide asynchronous communication to the
>> BC. Is there a useful pattern to identify a SE consumer at the enriched
>> async BC provider side for a BC callback to a dynamically created  (..
>> or pooled) SE "Listener" interface/portType consumer at the async
>> response?
>>
>> Thanks for any ideas to such kind of (real world) playground.
>> Joerg
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   

Reply via email to