Hi Lars,
Thanks for your response,
OK: I have setup the SNMP data types schemas xsd for the SMI data types and 
SNMP Manager data structure (VariableBinding, PDU, Traget) related to the 
snmp4j framework.  Then I have setup the WSDLs:
SnmpManager, SnmpManagerListener(for async com)
SnmpTrapListener and a optional SnmpTrapRouter.
So in the first step I want to start with the SnmpManager to create simple SNMP 
GET or SET actions to a target SNMP agent. So the next step would be to replace 
the un-/marshalling from your example by cxf functionality. Therfor I have set 
up a cxf-se-wsdl-first SU maven module. Now I am just on the way to put it 
together.
Does this help to understand?
Cheers
joerg
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von 
Lars Heinemann
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2009 11:14
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: AW: SMX3.3 Writing a BC

Joerg,

I am not sure if I got what you intend to do.
It seems to me that you are working on some kind of SNMP - Webservice
bridge, right?
Maybe you could explain to us a bit more detailed what exactly has to
be done to have support for receiving traps or doing GETS ?
I am not that familiar with the snmp protocol so I only did this
simple OID polling.

Regards
Lars



2009/2/5 Hubschneider Joerg (CI/TMP) <[email protected]>:
> Hi Lars,
> I'm glad to meet you servicemix guys. My problem is, that I am new to 
> servicemix with experience only based on apache-cxf services and I have now 
> to digg inside the servicemix framework. So my next simple question is:
>
> Can I directly extent my "SnmpManagerWsImpl" from ProviderEndPoint by adding 
> the necessary constructors and register it at the "smx-arch bc" created 
> MyComponent implementation?
>
> Kind regrads
> joerg
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag 
> von Lars Heinemann
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2009 10:45
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: AW: SMX3.3 Writing a BC
>
> I agree.
>
> Jörg, it would be good to extend the existing servicemix component. If
> you are willed to share your work with the community then you are
> welcome to submit patches for servicemix-snmp bc. I would be happy to
> apply them.
>
> Regards
> Lars
>
>
> 2009/2/5 Freeman Fang <[email protected]>:
>> Hi,
>> Then I think the better way is add features based on the currrent snmp bc,
>> and if you want you can provide patch so that other guys can benefit from
>> your work. :-)
>> Regards
>> Freeman
>>
>> Hubschneider Joerg (CI/TMP) wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Freemann
>>> Thanks for your response. OK, I want to provide a fully featured SNMP
>>> protocoll BC. I have taken a look to the existent snmp-bc from Lars
>>> Heinemann, which is a OID polling component. If I want to support SNMP  GET
>>> (GET_WALK GET_BULK..) and SET actions and in addition receiving SNMP traps,
>>> I have to set up the appropriated SNMP schemas and WSDLs for full featured
>>> SNMP over WebServices inside a ESB.
>>> OK, I hope my intention is more clear.
>>> Kind regards
>>> Joerg
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Freeman Fang [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5.
>>> Februar 2009 10:01
>>> An: [email protected]
>>> Betreff: Re: SMX3.3 Writing a BC
>>>
>>> Hubschneider Joerg (CI/TMP) wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello servicemix guys,
>>>>
>>>> I want to write a Binding Component with a cxf-se-wsdl-first SU
>>>> provider. Is there a nice example which helps a newbie for a rapid
>>>> startup?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I understand what you want here.
>>> May I ask why you need write a Binding Component yourself, we already have
>>> cxf binding component which also support asynchronous communication.
>>> Freeman
>>>
>>>>
>>>> In the second step, I want to provide asynchronous communication to the
>>>> BC. Is there a useful pattern to identify a SE consumer at the enriched
>>>> async BC provider side for a BC callback to a dynamically created  (..
>>>> or pooled) SE "Listener" interface/portType consumer at the async
>>>> response?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any ideas to such kind of (real world) playground.
>>>> Joerg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://lhein.blogspot.com
>



-- 
http://lhein.blogspot.com

Reply via email to