I'll bite that :) I guess you are right.
/je On Oct 15, 2010, at 2:03 AM, raulvk....@gmail.com wrote: > Hmm... I actually think the description should focus on integration rather > and enterprise apps. > > Otherwise, the purpuse becomes too generic and bland. > > Also, coining it as a platform for enterprise apps, doesn't it make it > compete with Spring DM Server, JBossAS, etc. All of which are OSGi already, > or in the process of transitioning. > > Just my 2 cents. Will try and describe my vision later. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Johan Edstrom <seij...@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 01:48:53 > To: <dev@servicemix.apache.org> > Reply-To: dev@servicemix.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ServiceMix future > > ServiceMix "The primary platform for OSGi enterprise applications" > > Which really is how I treat it, position it and debate it when out on jobs. > > /je > On Oct 15, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Bengt Rodehav wrote: > >> OSGi based platform for enterprise applications. > > Johan Edstrom > > j...@opennms.org > > They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary > safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. > > Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 > > > > > Johan Edstrom j...@opennms.org They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
