+1 good point Gert
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]> wrote: > L.S., > > How about I split out the ideas about the NMR into a separate page > linked from the roadmap? It looks like we first have to get a grip on > what exactly are the requirements and use cases we want to handle with > our new NMR implementation... > > Regards, > > Gert Vanthienen > ------------------------ > FuseSource > Web: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Regarding to the new name of NMR, we could use another acronym --> SML >> = ServiceMix Messaging Layer or EML = Endpoints Messaging Layer as the >> main goal of this component will be to deliver messages to endpoints >> exposed in bundles or in another SMX instances, will also handle >> transaction between transactional endpoints, audit messages, provide a >> registry to locate endpoints registered and least but not least >> provide clustering or clouding >> >> Regards, >> >> Charles Moulliard >> >> Sr. Principal Solution Architect - FuseSource >> Apache Committer >> >> Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >> Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard >> Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard >> Skype: cmoulliard >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't want to split NMR. NMR (or the new proposed name, ServiceMix GL) IS >>> ServiceMix 4 :). >>> In fact ServiceMix 4 is a premium integration platform for other projects >>> (Karaf, CXF, Camel, ActiveMQ, ODE, etc) and the NMR. >>> >>> So basically my answer is no, I prefer to keep NMR as the main ServiceMix >>> project. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 03/01/2011 09:42 PM, Michael Van wrote: >>>> >>>> I was a proponent of splitting NMR off of SMX and making it its very own >>>> TLP. >>>> But, if you guys are going to integrate it deeper into SMX, I can see >>>> where >>>> that wouldnt' work. ;-) >>>> >>> >> >
