Thx. Great job. Charles
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]> wrote: > L.S., > > I created > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/ServiceMix+5+-+NMR+Improvements > as an initial stab at capturing what we need from our NMR layer. The > requirements section list the high-level goals we want to achieve, but > I think the main thing to work out is the use cases section: what are > the things we want to be able to do with our new NMR layer > implementation. I've added a few obvious use cases but feel to append > to that list, so we can get a clearer picture of what is covered by > the buzzwords we listed in the requirements section. > > (By the way, I wrote these first few scenario using Camel routes as an > example, but those obviously cover CXF endpoints and anything else we > plan to integrate with the NMR as well.) > > Regards, > > Gert Vanthienen > ------------------------ > FuseSource > Web: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Gert Vanthienen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> L.S., >> >> How about I split out the ideas about the NMR into a separate page >> linked from the roadmap? It looks like we first have to get a grip on >> what exactly are the requirements and use cases we want to handle with >> our new NMR implementation... >> >> Regards, >> >> Gert Vanthienen >> ------------------------ >> FuseSource >> Web: http://fusesource.com >> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Regarding to the new name of NMR, we could use another acronym --> SML >>> = ServiceMix Messaging Layer or EML = Endpoints Messaging Layer as the >>> main goal of this component will be to deliver messages to endpoints >>> exposed in bundles or in another SMX instances, will also handle >>> transaction between transactional endpoints, audit messages, provide a >>> registry to locate endpoints registered and least but not least >>> provide clustering or clouding >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Charles Moulliard >>> >>> Sr. Principal Solution Architect - FuseSource >>> Apache Committer >>> >>> Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard >>> Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard >>> Skype: cmoulliard >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I don't want to split NMR. NMR (or the new proposed name, ServiceMix GL) IS >>>> ServiceMix 4 :). >>>> In fact ServiceMix 4 is a premium integration platform for other projects >>>> (Karaf, CXF, Camel, ActiveMQ, ODE, etc) and the NMR. >>>> >>>> So basically my answer is no, I prefer to keep NMR as the main ServiceMix >>>> project. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 03/01/2011 09:42 PM, Michael Van wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I was a proponent of splitting NMR off of SMX and making it its very own >>>>> TLP. >>>>> But, if you guys are going to integrate it deeper into SMX, I can see >>>>> where >>>>> that wouldnt' work. ;-) >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
