Hi Grzegorz
I think, you mean ServiceMix 6.0.0. It looks good for me. I prefer the modularized version of the feature (exactly like it looks now). It is more flexible and can be better extended with additional features. We can eventually create a new maven submodule drools (org.apache.servicemix/drools) in ServiceMix. It could contain a submodule feature(org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature) containing this feature. Your feature would be accessible with ulr: mvn:org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/feature We can think once (when haveng more such features) about extracting this submodule in a separate repository (something like servicemix-features) with own lifecycle. We have already an issue for the new feature https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2497 Regards Krzysztof On 14.04.2015 10:40, Grzegorz Hałajko wrote: > Hi > > > I would like to add Drools 6.2 to SerwiceMix 6.2 > > And this is my proposal: > > https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/00e0c8480e0d8f3f46f552e20c5bc44a52be8411 > > New feature will be > "mvn:org.apache.servicemix/apache-servicemix/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/drools6" > > I was inspired by drools-karaf-features but in my version I changed > versions in external bundles (e.g. camel , cxf ) to supported in > ServiceMix. > > Also I see another way to create features.xml. One big feature e.g drools6 > with all bundles (kie,drools,jbpm), from projekt and another three > supported camel, spring and blueprint. > > What do you think? > > Regards > GH > > -- Krzysztof Sobkowiak JEE & OSS Architect Apache Software Foundation Member Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
