+1
Regards
JB
On 04/14/2015 11:23 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
Hi Grzegorz
I think, you mean ServiceMix 6.0.0.
It looks good for me. I prefer the modularized version of the feature (exactly
like it looks now). It is more flexible
and can be better extended with additional features.
We can eventually create a new maven submodule drools
(org.apache.servicemix/drools) in ServiceMix. It could contain a
submodule feature(org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature) containing this
feature. Your feature would be accessible with ulr:
mvn:org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/feature
We can think once (when haveng more such features) about extracting this
submodule in a separate repository (something
like servicemix-features) with own lifecycle.
We have already an issue for the new feature
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2497
Regards
Krzysztof
On 14.04.2015 10:40, Grzegorz Hałajko wrote:
Hi
I would like to add Drools 6.2 to SerwiceMix 6.2
And this is my proposal:
https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/00e0c8480e0d8f3f46f552e20c5bc44a52be8411
New feature will be
"mvn:org.apache.servicemix/apache-servicemix/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/drools6"
I was inspired by drools-karaf-features but in my version I changed
versions in external bundles (e.g. camel , cxf ) to supported in
ServiceMix.
Also I see another way to create features.xml. One big feature e.g drools6
with all bundles (kie,drools,jbpm), from projekt and another three
supported camel, spring and blueprint.
What do you think?
Regards
GH
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
