+1
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:07 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > +1, > > SMX 5.x can go on EOL after those releases, and now focus on SMX 6 & 7 (it's > aligned with the Karaf versions lifecycle). > > Regards > JB > > > On 01/27/2016 12:00 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I'd like to summarize the IRC discussion about ServiceMix 5. We have >> currently 3 active branches: 5.4.x, 5.5.x and 5.x (for 5.6.x) >> >> * 5.4.x (Karaf 2.4.3, Camel 2.14.4, CXF 3.0.5, ActiveMQ 5.11.3) - I'm >> going to upgrade it to Karaf 2.4.4 and release the last version 5.4.3 from >> this branch - no new releases are expected for the dependencies. I propose >> to make the branch EOL after the next release >> * 5.5.x (Karaf 2.4.3, Camel 2.15.5, CXF 3.0.6, ActiveMQ 5.12.1) - I'm >> going to upgrade to Karaf 2.4.4 and ActiveMQ 5.12.2 and release the version >> 5.5.3. Here we can still expect the new Camel releases so we should still >> maintain this branch >> * 5.x (Karaf 2.4.3, Camel 2.16.1, CXF 3.1.4, ActiveMQ 5.12.1) - I'm >> going to upgrade to Karaf 2.4.4, ActiveMQ 5.12.2 and Camel 2.16.2 (under the >> vote) and release the 5.6.0. Here we can still expect some releases for >> Camel and ActiveMQ so we should maintain this branch as long we have new >> releases for the dependencies. >> >> I propose to stop the further maintenance of ServiceMix 5 with EOL of >> ServiceMix 5.6.x (the 5.x branch). We should focus then only on ServiceMix 6 >> and 7 (which should be already a stable version). We should also advice >> people to migrate to ServiceMix 6 or 7. >> >> Regards >> Krzysztof >> >> >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
