Yea… using the “_” separator would work. We couldn’t do a “.”, but a separator could work to denote the “version” from servicemix.
Dan > On Jan 4, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > That could work but we need to extend the version with a specific iteration. > > For instance servicemix-specs-jaxrs-api-2.1 could be > servicemix-specs-jaxrs-api-2.1_1 (for instance, we can imagine to have a new > fix/builds on the same spec version). It's the same format as in the bundles. > > Regards > JB > > On 01/04/2018 05:26 PM, Francois Papon wrote: >> Hi, >> I think it's a very good idea. >> Just for my curiosity, why not use the specification version in the >> release ? >> For example, in servicemix-specs-2.9.0, the jaxrs-api version is 2.1, >> may be it would be easier to check if the new release will be >> servicemix-specs-jaxrs-api-2.1 ? >> And to release a fix version we could add a last number in the version. >> François >> Le 04/01/2018 à 19:49, Daniel Kulp a écrit : >>> I definitely agree with this. The last thing I needed from specs was >>> JUST a new jax-rs bundle so I did just do a release of just that bundle. >>> However, with the build setup for monolithic releases, it was harder than >>> it should be. It would be great to get the poms and such setup so we >>> could just release the individual specs that change. >>> >>> One question would be around version number - the last “full release” was >>> 2.9.0. For updates to current specs, do we jump to 3.0? For brand new >>> specs, would we start at 3.0 or start at 1.0 like we do in bundles? >>> >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 4, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> Up to now, we did monolithic ServiceMix Spec release (all spec in a row). >>>> >>>> As the spec are very stable, it's really painful to do a full specs >>>> release when a did a minor update or fix on a single spec. >>>> >>>> As we do for the bundles, I propose to change ServiceMix Specs in order to >>>> be able to release atomic spec. >>>> >>>> Thoughts ? >>>> >>>> If you agree, I will prepare the change. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
