Hi
+1 for Craig's suggestion. ShardingSphere community release vote should follow this way. In SkyWalking release vote, I think most PPMC provided their checked list. ------------------ Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin Twitter, wusheng1108 ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "apache.clr"<[email protected]>; Date: Fri, Apr 5, 2019 10:56 AM To: "dev"<[email protected]>; Subject: Re: Release votes Sorry, totally forgot the link https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c891eb5543559d8894974ea39b11001e4302c1e3b0f11e47323af929@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E > On Apr 4, 2019, at 4:09 PM, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like you to take a look at this release vote by OpenWhisk. In particular, > the call for a vote has a checklist that the reviewers are expected to look > at. > > The reviewers itemize which checklist items that they actually checked. > > This is a model for release votes in the podling community. Let's see if we > can do the same here. > > I've seen recent podling votes in which most of the votes were simple +1. > Let's not do that. > > Craig > > Craig Russell > Member, Apache Incubator PMC > [email protected] > > > Craig Russell Member, Apache Incubator PMC [email protected]
