Thanks Sheng for pointing out this and I just wonder the SkyWalking will
trace the transaction event according to the issue [1]. And this
transaction event could have the common SPI interface with the different
vendor implementation, e.g.  the ServiceComb and the Seata ?

Thanks,
Zheng Feng

[1] https://github.com/seata/seata/issues/714

Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2019年4月26日周五 下午6:47写道:

> Please be advised, SkyWalking and seata integration are ongoing too.
>
> https://github.com/seata/seata/issues/714
>
> SkyWalking agent even will be binding in Seata TC binary release.
>
> As shardingsphere pmc are developing SkyWalking plugin too. Please be
> careful, don't make the conflict.
>
> zhaojun <[email protected]>于2019年4月26日 周五下午6:41写道:
>
> > Hi, all
> >
> > currently, we have integrated with saga using graph based engine in
> > shardingsphere[1]
> > it need us to collect all participated actual SQL, then submit to saga
> > actuator in commit/rollback phase.
> > if application crashed before invoking saga actuator, undo log of branch
> > transaction SQL will not be saved,
> > so recovery thread will not be executed correctly.
> >
> > it's better that encapsulating every actual SQL as a saga task in
> > shardingsphere side,
> > then submit to saga actuator realtime instead of batch processing all the
> > SQLs at commit/rollback phase.
> > this architecture will make the boundary more clear between shardingsphre
> > and saga, currently we have done some additional works for integrating
> saga.
> >
> > any thought?
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> https://github.com/sharding-sphere/shardingsphere-spi-impl/tree/master/sharding-transaction-spi-impl/sharding-transaction-base-spi-impl/sharding-transaction-base-saga
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/sharding-sphere/shardingsphere-spi-impl/tree/master/sharding-transaction-spi-impl/sharding-transaction-base-spi-impl/sharding-transaction-base-saga
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------
> > Zhao Jun
> > Apache Sharding-Sphere & ServiceComb
> >
> > --
> Sheng Wu
> SkyWalking, Shardingsphere and Zipkin
>

Reply via email to