I don't have any idea about how the module 'shardingsphere-master-slave' vs
'shardingsphere-read-write-split', was named.
If there was no specific reason, it is like a historical debt, but does not
matter so much, as it has been there for a long time, everyone knows
the function of the module.
In the meantime, 'read-write-split' is more obvious from the
processing/action perspective of the module. 'Master/Slave' is also fine
from the processing object(datasource) perspective.

For simple processing and not considering much, the replacement of
'master/slave' to 'primary/replica' including the combinations is much
straightforward. It is kind of 'leave it as is' processing.

For moving one step further, renaming the module to 'read-write-split' is a
way to go. The questions are:
shall we replace 'MasterSlave' as 'ReadWriteSplit' at all places?
Do we need to consider if the replacement is meaningful at any place, such
as the below names:
MasterSlaveDataSourceRuleConfiguration
MasterSlaveLoadBalanceAlgorithm



On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:29 PM [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I like
>
> MasterDataSource -> PrimaryDataSource
> SlaveDataSource -> ReplicaDataSource
>
>
> But I am not sure about
>
> MasterSlave -> PrimaryReplica
>
> Because ShardingSphere's feature is route the update SQL
> to PrimaryDataSource and route the query SQL to ReplicaDataSource.
> The name ReadWriteSplit may describe the feature more clear.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> ------------------
>
> Sincerely,
> Liang Zhang (John)
> Apache ShardingSphere
>
>
> Juan Pan <[email protected]> 于2020年9月13日周日 上午10:07写道:
>
> > Hi Craig,
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your suggestion. :-)
> > For me, both `primary` and `source` are ok.
> >
> >
> > > usually using terms like "primary", "secondary", "source", and
> "replica"
> > Considering the expression above is mentioned in [1].
> >
> >
> > > There are good reasons for MySQL to use "source" instead of "primary"
> > because in their model there may be many "source" databases.
> > Actually, ShardingSphere could also have many "source" databases
> > (Depending on the user's configuration).
> >
> >
> > > MasterSlave -> ReadWriteSplit
> > IMO, this renaming does not sound wonderful. I prefer
> >
> >
> > > MasterSlave -> PrimaryReplica  or MasterSlave -> SourceReplica
> >
> >
> > Moreover, I'd like to listen to others' opinions.
> >
> >
> > [1] https://mysqlhighavailability.com/mysql-terminology-updates/
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Trista
> >
> >
> >  Juan Pan (Trista)
> >
> > Senior DBA & PMC of Apache ShardingSphere
> > E-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 09/12/2020 22:26,Craig Russell<[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This will be a significant change so I think it would be good to resolve
> > all of the naming before any PR is proposed. The first place to start
> might
> > be the documentation to see all of the name changes in one place.
> >
> > There are good reasons for MySQL to use "source" instead of "primary"
> > because in their model there may be many "source" databases. Personally I
> > don't think "source" is particularly obvious to users, but they did not
> ask
> > me. ;-)
> >
> > For ShardingSphere, "primary" and "replica" seem to be better choices. It
> > will be easy for us to tell users that ShardingSphere's "replica"
> > corresponds to MySQL's "source".
> >
> > So the concepts to be changed might be:
> >
> > MasterSlave -> PrimaryReplica
> > MasterDataSource -> PrimaryDataSource
> > SlaveDataSource -> ReplicaDataSource
> >
> > And again, it might be easier to review the name changes in the context
> of
> > documentation changes.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Craig
> >
> > On Sep 6, 2020, at 2:42 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I want to discuss to rename MasterSlave module to ReadWriteSplit module.
> >
> > MySQL[1] has already change the master and slave to source and replica.
> >
> > Some concepts I plan to change:
> >
> > MasterSlave -> ReadWriteSplit
> > MasterDataSource -> SourceDataSource
> > SlaveDataSource -> ReplicaDataSource
> >
> > Please advice me.
> >
> > [1] https://mysqlhighavailability.com/mysql-terminology-updates/
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Liang Zhang (John)
> > Apache ShardingSphere
> >
> > Craig L Russell
> > [email protected]
> >
>

Reply via email to