Some comments on the alternate approach.

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/rewrite/ConcatVisitor.java
File
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/rewrite/ConcatVisitor.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/rewrite/ConcatVisitor.java#newcode187
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/rewrite/ConcatVisitor.java:187:
// Regardless what happens, inject a copy of the first node,
Update the comment to indicat that we inject as many copies of the first
node as needed, with the new (concat) URIs.

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/ConcatUriManager.java
File
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/ConcatUriManager.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/ConcatUriManager.java#newcode40
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/ConcatUriManager.java:40:
@Inject(optional = true)
Fix indentation on this line and the next.

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/ConcatUriManager.java#newcode127
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/ConcatUriManager.java:127:
/*
Remove commented block.

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManager.java
File
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManager.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManager.java#newcode132
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManager.java:132:
uriBuilders.add(uriBuilder);
Most of the code here (from line 132 - 139) are repititions from the
block before the for loop. Could we remove the code from outside the for
loop and bring the first iteration in here itself?

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManager.java#newcode153
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManager.java:153:
if(batchUris != null && uriBuilder != ctx.makeQueryParams(null, null)) {
Space before (

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManager.java#newcode166
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManager.java:166:
for(UriBuilder cocnatUriBuilder : uriBuilders) {
cocnatUriBuilder -> concatUriBuilder

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManager.java#newcode168
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManager.java:168:
if(version != null) {
Indentation off and space needed before (

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManagerTest.java
File
java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManagerTest.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/diff/108001/java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManagerTest.java#newcode140
java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultConcatUriManagerTest.java:140:
assertNull(uri.getUris().get(0).getScheme());
I think you should also assert that the size of getUris() is exactly 1
before each of these blocks? Similar asserts for size of getUris() might
be needed in other tests as well.

http://codereview.appspot.com/3734041/

Reply via email to