> On 2011-05-20 00:32:42, Ryan Baxter wrote:
> > trunk/java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/auth/AuthenticationServletFilter.java,
> >  line 146
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/760/diff/1/?file=19450#file19450line146>
> >
> >     Should we add the @Override notation here to indicate your overriding 
> > the method?  It wasn't clear to me until I read your comment.

I think the @Override annotation should be added to methods thats being 
overriden. Here I just create method with protected scope so it could be 
overridden if this class is extended.


- Henry


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/760/#review690
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2011-05-21 10:03:03, Henry Saputra wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/760/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-05-21 10:03:03)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Update the AuthenticationServletFilter:
> 1. Make the auth realm configurable via property or override able protected 
> method.
> 2. Sets the auth header from the right handler. Currently the code just sets 
> the response's WWW-Authenticate header whenever an auth handler return null 
> st. So if the next handler return a security token, the response contains 
> WWW-Authenticate header from previous handler. This CR change the logic to 
> also add WWW-Authenticate header if token is not set or 
> InvalidAuthenticationException is thrown.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> trunk/java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/auth/AuthenticationServletFilter.java
>  1125364 
>   
> trunk/java/common/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/auth/AuthenticationServletFilterTest.java
>  1125364 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/760/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Update unit test for null st.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Henry
> 
>

Reply via email to