-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1689/#review1706
-----------------------------------------------------------



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/1689/#comment3876>

    Can you also verify typeof callback is a Function?  If I push a 
non-Function into your actionListenerMap, it'll just get called in the 
runAction code and puke.



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/1689/#comment3878>

    My gut feeling is that the token being an object with a function in it is a 
bad idea.  Why can't the token be a number?  Are you concerned that 
malicious/buggy code will accidentally remove a listener it didn't add? 



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/1689/#comment3877>

    Is it necessary to check the typeof regToken.remove?


- Stanton


On 2011-08-31 20:07:34, Dan Dumont wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/1689/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-08-31 20:07:34)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter and Stanton Sievers.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Specification: 
> http://code.google.com/p/opensocial-resources/issues/detail?id=1210
> 
> Add 2 functions to the actions feature.
> 1 to allow the container to register a listener for an action being run.  The 
> listener would be run whenever an action matching the id provided was run.
> 1 to allow the container to unregister(remove) any listener added with the 
> previous function.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SHINDIG-1612.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1612
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js
>  1163664 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1689/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> If anyone has any suggestions as to how to approach adding unit tests for 
> this, I'm all ears.
> 
> It looks like that in order to get the actions api to hit this code, by 
> calling runAction, I'd need to somehow fake setting up a gadget site and 
> register a fake action.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan
> 
>

Reply via email to