A Noop cache impl should be easy to implement and is a common idiom.

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:30 AM, daviesd <davi...@oclc.org> wrote:

> I understand that OAuth2Cache provides a mechanism for implementing a cache
> that the OAuth2Store uses to limit requests to the OAuth2Persister.
> However, if my OAuth2Persister implementation uses JPA or some other
> persistence model that already has caching built-in, the OAuth2Cache is
> redundant and probably not desired.  Especially if you have deployed
> multiple shindig servers serving up the same domain.  You¹d then have to
> have ³stickiness² set to guarantee getting a value from the cache,
> otherwise
> it would just be hitting the persister anyway.
>
> So my question is... Can I provided an OAuth2Cache implementation that does
> nothing (other than return nulls when requesting objects)?  Or would the
> in-memory implementation be sufficient for a production environment?
>
> Thanks,
> Doug
>
>


-- 
Paul Lindner -- lind...@inuus.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner

Reply via email to