Yes, if we just move it to Shindig attic we can simply bring back if enough contributors interested to make up the lost features in PHP version of Shindig.
- Henry On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Stanton Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for attic. > > Once we put it in the attic is there a path back to active development if > we do see an influx of PHP contributions? I realize the cost of bringing > the PHP version up to date is only going to grow over time, but it would > be nice to know that the possibility is there if ambitious PHP > contributors come along. > > Thanks, > -Stanton > > > > From: Henry Saputra <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], [email protected], > Date: 04/18/2012 19:00 > Subject: [VOTE] Vote the fate of PHP part of Apache Shindig after > 2.5.0 release > > > > Hi Shindig community, > > As followup of the fate of PHP version of Apache Shindig from my > previous email to the community, I would like to ask for a VOTE thread > of what should be done with it after 2.5.0 release. > > Maintaining status quo seems to be out question now since we have lack > of contributors to keep up with the Java counterpart. > > Here are the proposed alternatives: > > [ ] Move the PHP part to Apache Shindig attic at > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/attic. This would be new > directory where the PHP version will reside. It will still be under > ASF 2.0 license but not actively developed. > [ ] Delete the PHP version and remove it from the Apache Shindig > repository. > [ ] Dont really care, do what you want! > [ ] Other: <state your option> > > Everybody is invited to Vote but only PMC votes count toward final tally. > > The Vote is open for 72 hours. > > > Thanks much guys, > > Henry > > > PS: > > Here is my vote: > > [ x ] Move the PHP part to Apache Shindig attic at > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/attic. This would be new > directory where the PHP version will reside. It will still be under > ASF 2.0 license but not actively developed. > >
