Yes that is probably a good idea :)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:47 AM, daviesd <davi...@oclc.org> wrote: > Ryan, > > Thanks for the explanation. I¹ve been on vacation, so sorry for not > responding quicker. Should I open up an enhancement jira for this? > > doug > > > On 10/29/12 8:47 PM, "Ryan Baxter" <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote: > > > So the gadget XML is not cached on the server, but the metadata request > is > > cached on the client? The NO_CACHE option looks like it is only used to > > tell shindig to render the gadget in debug mode. It is also specifically > > used for rendering gadgets not for caching in the container. The > metadata > > caching functionality in the common container is lacking. Not only is it > > always cached, but the common container never purges the cache. It > > wouldn't be hard to check for whether the container is in debug mode and > > disable the caching. Unless we want to introduce a separate caching > param > > for the container as well... > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:57 AM, daviesd <davi...@oclc.org> wrote: > > > >> > I have a scenario where a gadget is rendered from a known url, > dropbox lets > >> > say. If later on if I remove the gadget from dropbox and my container > >> > tries > >> > to re-render it I get the message > >> > > >> > Unable to retrieve spec for > >> > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/xxxxx/gadgets/oauth2.xml. HTTP error 404 > >> > > >> > Which seems to come from AbstractSpecFactory.java within Shindig. > >> > > >> > However the call to holder.getGadgetInfo still returns the cached > entry, so > >> > there is no way for me to detect this scenario so that I can handle it > >> > appropriately in my chrome elements (disable things). > >> > > >> > If the gadget url is missing on the very first render, then I get > back a > >> > error inside gadgetInfo that is passed to the navigateGadget callback. > >> > > >> > I¹m pretty sure I have caching turned off when I render the gadget. > >> > > >> > renderParams[osapi.container.RenderParam.NO_CACHE] = true; > >> > > >> > Any ideas on how to detect that the gadget xml spec has gone away on > the > >> > first scenario? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > doug > >> > > > > >
