> On Dec. 12, 2012, 7:20 p.m., Dan Dumont wrote:
> > Looking this over again, I'm not sure what to do here.  This looks like a 
> > library that we've gotten from the project 
> > http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/
> > They wouldn't have code to our standards, and I'm not sure if we should 
> > modify it (which would make tracking changes a bit more difficult).
> > 
> > It also appears that we have copied their pre-optimized file as a .opt file 
> > so that our compiler can skip that step... it might be optimized better 
> > than the basic optimization we perform during build.
> > 
> > Can someone else comment on what we should do here?
> > Paul?
> 
> Paul Lindner wrote:
>     I'm fine either way.  swfobject.js hasn't been updated since 2009 so I'm 
> not concerned with upstream integration.
> 
> Dan Dumont wrote:
>     Ok. Marshall, is there a compelling reason (aside from general clean up) 
> to make this change?
>     I think I'd rather leave it as-is if there's no other reason to change 
> it, since it is 3rd party code.
> 
> Marshall Shi wrote:
>     No I don't have other compelling reasons. If this is an external project. 
> Would make more sense to move it out from shindig core feature to the extra 
> features?

I think that probably makes sense.  Anyone else care to comment?


- Dan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8244/#review14365
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 4, 2012, 2:53 a.m., Marshall Shi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8244/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 4, 2012, 2:53 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter, Dan Dumont, Stanton Sievers, and 
> Rich Thompson.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - The swfobject.opt.js should be removed from source code.
> - The swfobject.js code format need some refinement to align with Shindig JS 
> code guideline.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SHINDIG-1887.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1887
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/pom.xml 1401141 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/swfobject/swfobject.js
>  1383189 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/swfobject/swfobject.opt.js
>  1383189 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8244/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Done
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Marshall Shi
> 
>

Reply via email to