Hi Andreas, I'm not sure what you're suggesting. We have no option of using invalid JSON files, and likewise no option on which JSON parser we use, as our incorporation of Shindig is into a larger platform that already has JSON services.
We have a project requirement to use valid JSON (ECMA-404) as the clients include government and industry. As we want to be able to validate all of our source files it would be counterproductive to go back to an older JSON parser that permitted comments. Cheers, Ichiro On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Andreas Kohn <andreas.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed the comments in those files as well, and the reason they are > accepted on Shindig's side is that an older version of the json library > where comments were still "ok" is used. > > If you have trouble with them, you might want to check your dependencies > for a org.json:json version newer than 20070829. > > Regards, > -- > Andreas >
