OK...I get it now. I think you're right in that ReferenceResolver would be better than Object. I fear that we will end up getting a ton of classes referred to as "Object" so the more descriptive the class name, the better.
A On Dec 2, 2012, at 8:52 PM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Hello Adam > Le 03/12/12 09:01, Adam Estrada a écrit : >> Excellent Martin...I like the ObjectResolver class and I think that the >> ObjectConverters class is always going to be sorely needed as we often think >> about metadata as a second class citizen. > > Thanks. But I'm still wondering if the class names are appropriate. I wonder > if "ReferenceResolver" would be more appropriate than "ObjectResolver" since > we resolve only idref, uuidref or href attributes, and if "ValueParser" would > be more appropriate than "ObjectConverters" since this class is only about > some attributes or elements values (URL, UUID, Locale) and do not convert, > for example a metadata object to an other metadata object... > > Martin >
