+1 to the rename since we are actually resolving references, according to the initial email.
Joe On Dec 2, 2012, at 9:00 PM, Adam Estrada <[email protected]> wrote: > OK...I get it now. I think you're right in that ReferenceResolver would be > better than Object. I fear that we will end up getting a ton of classes > referred to as "Object" so the more descriptive the class name, the better. > > A > > > On Dec 2, 2012, at 8:52 PM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > >> Hello Adam >> Le 03/12/12 09:01, Adam Estrada a écrit : >>> Excellent Martin...I like the ObjectResolver class and I think that the >>> ObjectConverters class is always going to be sorely needed as we often >>> think about metadata as a second class citizen. >> >> Thanks. But I'm still wondering if the class names are appropriate. I wonder >> if "ReferenceResolver" would be more appropriate than "ObjectResolver" since >> we resolve only idref, uuidref or href attributes, and if "ValueParser" >> would be more appropriate than "ObjectConverters" since this class is only >> about some attributes or elements values (URL, UUID, Locale) and do not >> convert, for example a metadata object to an other metadata object... >> >> Martin >> >
