Hi Nadeem, 

Can you please checkout the svn [1], add your code and submit a patch with all 
the code and documentation? 

Suresh 
[1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sis/sandbox/gsoc2013/crimgeoprofile/

On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Nadeem Anjum <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All, 
> 
> The update regarding the project is as mentioned below:
>       • I have updated the database in the server with the open street map 
> data of Indiana, after converting it to a routable network. I had extracted 
> data of just Indianapolis city too, but then the code for Indiana too 
> completed execution (after ~111 hours!), so I have uploaded the entire data 
> of Indiana. So now simulations can be run in Indiana
>       • The map has been focused to Indianapolis by default. 
>       • Link: http://gw76.iu.xsede.org/criminfo/
>       • A sample setup for simulating Routine Activity with locations and 50 
> crime spots marked has been saved as - "test1" . You can load it and click on 
> "Simulate Routine Activity" to run the simulation. You can also load 
> "test1-res" to view the results directly
>       • A sample setup for viewing the results of distance decay when 
> simulated on a map with conditions like presence of police-agent, absence of 
> guardian (victim-agent) at crime spot, inherent risk, profit value of spot 
> etc. has been saved as - "test2". You can load it and click on "Simulate 
> Distance Decay Activity" to run the simulation. You can also load "test2-res" 
> to view the results directly of simulation run 5 times
>       • I have started with commenting the code and documentation
> Apart form the documentation, I believe I have completed all that I had 
> mentioned in my proposal 
> (http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/nadeemanjum/14001).
>  Please note a couple of minor modifications to my original proposal:
>       • The original proposal mentioned only one form of motion - Random. But 
> we have implemented three forms of motion- Beeline, Random and Hybrid
>       • The original proposal mentioned simulating movement of v-agent and 
> police. However, I realized that there is no need to show the movement of 
> v-agents and police on the map explicitly. What matters is the presence or 
> absence of police and victim-agent (guardian of spot) in the vicinity of the 
> crime spot. These factors have been considered using a probabilistic model 
> for deciding whether the criminal-agent breaks into the crime spot, so it 
> serves the purpose.
> Obviously, I will be continuing after GSoC too for working towards a 
> publication and collecting data by running the simulation a large number of 
> times.
> 
>  If there is anything else you feel needs to be done before the GSoC deadline 
> of Sep 23 (apart form documentation and testing), please let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nadeem.

Reply via email to