Hi Suresh, The patch for the latest code is already submitted (on 16th Sep). I am in the process of completing the documentation. Once it is done, I will submit a new patch.
Thanks, Nadeem On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nadeem, > > Can you please checkout the svn [1], add your code and submit a patch with > all the code and documentation? > > Suresh > [1] - > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sis/sandbox/gsoc2013/crimgeoprofile/ > > On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Nadeem Anjum <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > The update regarding the project is as mentioned below: > > • I have updated the database in the server with the open street > map data of Indiana, after converting it to a routable network. I had > extracted data of just Indianapolis city too, but then the code for Indiana > too completed execution (after ~111 hours!), so I have uploaded the entire > data of Indiana. So now simulations can be run in Indiana > > • The map has been focused to Indianapolis by default. > > • Link: http://gw76.iu.xsede.org/criminfo/ > > • A sample setup for simulating Routine Activity with locations > and 50 crime spots marked has been saved as - "test1" . You can load it and > click on "Simulate Routine Activity" to run the simulation. You can also > load "test1-res" to view the results directly > > • A sample setup for viewing the results of distance decay when > simulated on a map with conditions like presence of police-agent, absence > of guardian (victim-agent) at crime spot, inherent risk, profit value of > spot etc. has been saved as - "test2". You can load it and click on > "Simulate Distance Decay Activity" to run the simulation. You can also load > "test2-res" to view the results directly of simulation run 5 times > > • I have started with commenting the code and documentation > > Apart form the documentation, I believe I have completed all that I had > mentioned in my proposal ( > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/nadeemanjum/14001). > Please note a couple of minor modifications to my original proposal: > > • The original proposal mentioned only one form of motion - > Random. But we have implemented three forms of motion- Beeline, Random and > Hybrid > > • The original proposal mentioned simulating movement of v-agent > and police. However, I realized that there is no need to show the movement > of v-agents and police on the map explicitly. What matters is the presence > or absence of police and victim-agent (guardian of spot) in the vicinity of > the crime spot. These factors have been considered using a probabilistic > model for deciding whether the criminal-agent breaks into the crime spot, > so it serves the purpose. > > Obviously, I will be continuing after GSoC too for working towards a > publication and collecting data by running the simulation a large number of > times. > > > > If there is anything else you feel needs to be done before the GSoC > deadline of Sep 23 (apart form documentation and testing), please let me > know. > > > > Thanks, > > Nadeem. > >
