Hello Rob

No problem, health is most important. I wish you speedy recovery. There
is no rush, take your time. A document table is great, if you want it
would be nice to add it to SIS-331:

    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-331

(Note: do you have an account on Apache JIRA? If yes, would you like to
be owner of that task?)

In the meantime, I have done a little bit of simplification in the code
that use AttributeName for implementing the actual mapping (but without
changing the mapping). In this process, I created a new JIRA task
documenting the mapping that we may question (only one case for now).
The reason is that I think the XSL file is based on the 2003 version of
ISO 19115 while the new revision published in 2014 could cause us to
reconsider a few choices.

    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-361

If we discover more cases that could be revisited, we can add them to
SIS-161 then submit them to the UNIDATA community.

Indeed, reading a XSL file is tedious. It makes you work yet more
appreciated! Siddhesh Rane is working on a JavaFX application which will
allow us to see the metadata in a convenient way. It will not help for
the XSL file, but it will allow us to see more easily the result of
those mapping on concrete examples.

    Regards,

        Martin


Le 07/06/2017 à 18:24, Rob Wallace a écrit :

> Hello Martin
>
> I have not abandoned you, it's just that I have had a medical problem
> which has caused me to be out of sorts for a few days. It is now being
> treated with antibiotics and should clear up hopefully within a week.
> I am busy preparing a word processing document table showing the
> matched and unmatched mapping of the ACDD attribute names in the
> various parts of the AttributeNames class Javadoc. Also, the mapping
> of the path info between the Javadoc and ISO-19115.
>
> I must say, visually reading the XSL file is difficult. I even used
> the Netbeans XML window to view the file and get to the hierarchy of
> interest to us. One can normally get to a branch or node name by using
> "find" though.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Rob 

Reply via email to