[x] +1 approve I've browsed API documentation, it looks good. I've checked binaries bundle, looks good. I'm only wondering about jakarta binaries (jakarta.activation and jakarta.xml.bind-api). Should we not include a copy of the Eclipse license somewhere ?
I've not done much test with sis and sisfx commands though, because sis-epsg-1.2 jar is not yet deployed to the official location (i.e https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/sis/non-free/sis-epsg/1.2/sis-epsg-1.2.jar”), which limit test possibilities. Thanks for the effort put to create the release, Le ven. 13 mai 2022 à 07:58, Bruno Kinoshita <[email protected]> a écrit : > [x] +1 approve > > Inspected files manually in the dist area and maven. Found no issues. Site > looks good too. > > Thanks Martin! > > On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 04:45, Martin Desruisseaux < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello all > > > > I would like to call for a vote on the following Apache SIS 1.2 release > > candidate (RC) artifacts: > > > > Change log/release notes: > > https://sis.staged.apache.org/release-notes/1.2.html > > > > All Release Artifacts: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/sis/1.2/RC1/ > > > > PGP release keys (signed using GnuPG): > > https://downloads.apache.org/sis/KEYS > > > > Maven staging repository: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesis-1037/ > > > > Web site https://sis.staged.apache.org/ except for Javadoc which will be > > updated the release day. The developer guide is also a work in progress > > not yet updated. > > > > Please verify the artifacts and vote. The vote will be open until > > Wednesday 18 (next week). Closing date may be changed to a later day if > > testers need more time. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > If any blocking issue is identified, new staging repositories with a > > second release candidate(RC2) will be prepared. > > > > Martin > > > > > > >
