+1 Not sure if I have a binding vote, but anyway
Werner On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:26 PM Martin Desruisseaux < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks all for the tests. > > Le 13/05/2022 à 11:29, Alexis Manin a écrit : > > > I'm only wondering about jakarta binaries (jakarta.activation and > > jakarta.xml.bind-api). Should we not include a copy of the Eclipse > > license somewhere ? > > > It is cited in the NOTICE file. This is my understanding of how the > legal stuff is handled at Apache, but we should probably double-check. > > > > I've not done much test with sis and sisfx commands though, because > > sis-epsg-1.2 jar is not yet deployed to the official location (i.e > > > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/sis/non-free/sis-epsg/1.2/sis-epsg-1.2.jar”), > > > which limit test possibilities. > Testing this release candidate with EPSG database requires modifying the > sis or sisfx shell scripts for adding the following option to the java > command: > > -Dorg.apache.sis.epsg.downloadURL= > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesis-1037/org/apache/sis/non-free/sis-epsg/1.2/sis-epsg-1.2.jar > > This is of course unconvenient. For the next release, we should provide > an easier mechanism for specify the staging repository URL. Maybe an > optional configuration file to put in the SIS_DATA directory? > > Another bug that I noticed is that when running the JavaFX application, > the offer to download EPSG database appears on the console instead of a > GUI window. This is a confusion caused by sis-console and sis-javafx > being both on the classpath. I will try to fix that in the next release. > > Martin > > >
