Yes, remove both. ————————— Kai Wan GitHub @wankai123
Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2022年5月13日周五 17:11写道： > > Hi Committers > > I have thought about this discussion and vote for months. Also, > several people asked me about this dozens of times. > InfluxDB 1.x and IoTDB plugins exist for years and months, I noticed > there are several issues. > > InfluxDB faced serious performance impact when it is used in > collecting/query traces and logs. Mostly due to trace ID making too > many candidates for query index, which is not expected/designed in > this kind of database. > IoTDB has no feedback since it is added. We need to consider > maintenance payload in months. > Every time when we need to update the core, we have to take care of > InfluxDB and IoTDB implementations, including e2e tests and inside > logic. > > In the SkyWalking community, we follow the principle, (mutable) core > features should have stable committers to keep eyes on it, also, they > should have stable feedback from the community. AFAIK, I don't think > both of these features reach this standard. > > So, I am initializing this discussion as well as voting, we should > consider removing both of these options. > > Please feedback here > https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9059, or in this mail > thread. > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > Twitter, wusheng1108
