Yes, remove both.
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 5:19 PM Kai Wan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, remove both. > > ————————— > Kai Wan > GitHub @wankai123 > > Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2022年5月13日周五 17:11写道： > > > > Hi Committers > > > > I have thought about this discussion and vote for months. Also, > > several people asked me about this dozens of times. > > InfluxDB 1.x and IoTDB plugins exist for years and months, I noticed > > there are several issues. > > > > InfluxDB faced serious performance impact when it is used in > > collecting/query traces and logs. Mostly due to trace ID making too > > many candidates for query index, which is not expected/designed in > > this kind of database. > > IoTDB has no feedback since it is added. We need to consider > > maintenance payload in months. > > Every time when we need to update the core, we have to take care of > > InfluxDB and IoTDB implementations, including e2e tests and inside > > logic. > > > > In the SkyWalking community, we follow the principle, (mutable) core > > features should have stable committers to keep eyes on it, also, they > > should have stable feedback from the community. AFAIK, I don't think > > both of these features reach this standard. > > > > So, I am initializing this discussion as well as voting, we should > > consider removing both of these options. > > > > Please feedback here > > https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9059, or in this mail > > thread. > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108
