+1 Carsten
2011/12/2 Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: >> ....I am inclined to agree, that the first level of child nodes to return >> should count into the overall limitation counter but should not be limited >> by that counter. >> >> Thus the first level of child nodes is always returned (if only as >> "pointers" or entries) while starting with the second level, the limit is >> enforced.... > > I agree with that, sounds like the least surprise in this case. > >> >> Patch welcome, I might say ;-) > > I also agree with that, also sounds like the least surprise in this case ;-) > > -Bertrand -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
