On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > ...In fact I would say, that BVPs without the property should just be used > anywhere....
that might work - I was going to say that [1] for example makes no sense in my health check context, but that provider is being careful to not add anything if the "resource" binding is not available so we're fine. >> ...3. Provide a service to collect relevant BVPs when setting up >> scripting, based on a set of context values. > > Since the selection is so easy with a service selection filter or target > attribute on a @Reference annotation, such a service would be overkill ;-)... Ok, I'm not a fan of the LDAP-like filter syntax but it's workable, and except for the DefaultSlingScript which needs to take care of backwards compatibility the filters should be simple. -Bertrand
