Le 30 déc. 2013 10:30, "Carsten Ziegeler" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > The more I think about it, the more I get the feeling that if we can't away > with execute(ServiceReference) in the executor api, this should be the only > method of that service...
That's what my SLING-3278-bertrand.patch does, attached to that issue. The implementation is much simpler, the downside is that health checks are not executed in parallel. Maybe returning a Future would do the trick. -Bertrand
